Blog #10

I found an article in the New York Times that details the new stresses that have approached libraries since the economic downturn started. I think what confuses me most is how the article made the increase in library patronage to be a negative, or at least not a positive, thing. Having never worked in a public library, I do not want to offend or insult anyone; I acknowledge that I would be unable to truly understand the stresses that are involved when working with such a diverse population--even before the economic downturn. However, I don't think that an increase in the number of people coming to the library should be considered a bad thing. Granted, the violence in and around libraries and the increase of thefts and other illegal activity is not welcomed.

I think librarians have wanted to see an upswing in the number of people who visit the library, and now that it has happened, libraries are unsure of how to deal with their new found popularity. The filled programs is amazing, and bringing in volunteer professionals is a great idea. I also think that bringing in a therapist to help deal with the emotions that come along with the environment is a great idea. I think the main thing that librarians need to do is think ahead and anticipate what will be coming next. I think libraries should be looking at how they can market themselves in the local government so that they do not end up with budget cuts. Libraries should be illustrating how they have been and are helping in the economic crisis. Increased patronage at a library should not be looked at as a bad thing, nor should it be super stressful. One of the goals of a library should be to reach increased numbers. When that comes about, it shouldn't be seen as negative.